No, I'm sure Vivian is a "District Attorney." She's a public official who acts as a prosecutor for the state. And I'm pretty sure Vivian has had to prosecute people she thought were innocent; for Troy is a District Attorney, and he's had to do it. In fact, I'm guessing she has to prosecute about 10 people a year who she thinks are innocent; for she and Troy both prosecute roughly the same number of people each year, and Troy has to prosecute about 10 people a year who he thinks are innocent. So we'll say she prosecutes 10 people a year who she thinks are innocent; and she has worked as a District Attorney for 13 years. As such, during her entire career as a District Attorney she's prosecuted 130 people she thought were innocent.
No
HINT: An Inductive Generalization supports a generalization about a group by referring to a sample of that group. This italicized argument's conclusion might seem like a generalization, but it does not refer to the frequency of a trend; and its premises do not refer to a sample of the group addressed in the conclusion.
| Try Again | Review Section Directions and Definitions |